<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube vs Vimeo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diyphotobits.com/2008/09/30/youtube-vs-vimeo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diyphotobits.com/2008/09/30/youtube-vs-vimeo/</link>
	<description>A few bits and pieces about photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: raymond</title>
		<link>http://www.diyphotobits.com/2008/09/30/youtube-vs-vimeo/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diyphotobits.com/?p=76#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>Oh no doubt that youtube now has better video --  I don&#039;t think it was the case back last year when I made that post though, at least not by default uploading the file I was using.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no doubt that youtube now has better video &#8212;  I don&#8217;t think it was the case back last year when I made that post though, at least not by default uploading the file I was using.  <img src='http://www.diyphotobits.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.diyphotobits.com/2008/09/30/youtube-vs-vimeo/comment-page-1/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diyphotobits.com/?p=76#comment-990</guid>
		<description>Youtube has great quality videos, i think are much better then vimeo. 

but the trick is you HAVE to save the ORIGNAL video file at 1280x720.

then it ends up like this.

Youtube - (remember to click - watch in HD-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zApPJ9xakyg

Vimeo - http://www.vimeo.com/3008869

And tell me which is better quality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube has great quality videos, i think are much better then vimeo. </p>
<p>but the trick is you HAVE to save the ORIGNAL video file at 1280&#215;720.</p>
<p>then it ends up like this.</p>
<p>Youtube &#8211; (remember to click &#8211; watch in HD-) <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zApPJ9xakyg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zApPJ9xakyg</a></p>
<p>Vimeo &#8211; <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/3008869" rel="nofollow">http://www.vimeo.com/3008869</a></p>
<p>And tell me which is better quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
