<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DIY Grey Card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diyphotobits.com/2008/11/27/diy-grey-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diyphotobits.com/2008/11/27/diy-grey-card/</link>
	<description>A few bits and pieces about photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:14:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: carlo ballestrero</title>
		<link>http://www.diyphotobits.com/2008/11/27/diy-grey-card/comment-page-1/#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator>carlo ballestrero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diyphotobits.com/?p=146#comment-1299</guid>
		<description>The meter reads the light reflection, not the colour. So readings are greatly influenced from the smoothness of the paper (and the angle of incidence of light on the greycard, of course). 
So it will be difficult to check an homemade greycard without a true greycard or a professional incident-light meter.
Better to read a simple  white matt paper and substract -2, 1/3 f   : it&#039;s exactly the same.

carlo  - again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The meter reads the light reflection, not the colour. So readings are greatly influenced from the smoothness of the paper (and the angle of incidence of light on the greycard, of course).<br />
So it will be difficult to check an homemade greycard without a true greycard or a professional incident-light meter.<br />
Better to read a simple  white matt paper and substract -2, 1/3 f   : it&#8217;s exactly the same.</p>
<p>carlo  &#8211; again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlo ballestrero</title>
		<link>http://www.diyphotobits.com/2008/11/27/diy-grey-card/comment-page-1/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>carlo ballestrero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 07:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diyphotobits.com/?p=146#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>The grey colour on a Kodak  Greycard  is a 50% grey (50%K). 
18% is the amount of  light reflection of a 50% grey.  That&#039;s why greycards are called 18% grey, and why you may achieve good results setting 127 -127 -127 in your bitmap file (50% K, if converted in B&amp;W). More or less is only a matter of your printer.

hope this helps.
carlo - professional photographer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The grey colour on a Kodak  Greycard  is a 50% grey (50%K).<br />
18% is the amount of  light reflection of a 50% grey.  That&#8217;s why greycards are called 18% grey, and why you may achieve good results setting 127 -127 -127 in your bitmap file (50% K, if converted in B&amp;W). More or less is only a matter of your printer.</p>
<p>hope this helps.<br />
carlo &#8211; professional photographer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raymond</title>
		<link>http://www.diyphotobits.com/2008/11/27/diy-grey-card/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diyphotobits.com/?p=146#comment-575</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what I would have thought -- but what I read, and what my actual print-and-shoot tests tell me,  is 118.  Strange but (apparently) true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I would have thought &#8212; but what I read, and what my actual print-and-shoot tests tell me,  is 118.  Strange but (apparently) true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai Klein</title>
		<link>http://www.diyphotobits.com/2008/11/27/diy-grey-card/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diyphotobits.com/?p=146#comment-564</guid>
		<description>Hi

I may be wrong or miss some fundamentals, but for me a 18% Grey calculated on 8 Bit RGB Values would be: 255*0.18 = 45,9 not 118 or 128 which is 46% and 50%.

Kind Regards

Kai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I may be wrong or miss some fundamentals, but for me a 18% Grey calculated on 8 Bit RGB Values would be: 255*0.18 = 45,9 not 118 or 128 which is 46% and 50%.</p>
<p>Kind Regards</p>
<p>Kai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
